Solana Stake Reward Adjustment Proposal, What Impact on SOL Price?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/03 18:30:04
0
Share
copy
Original Author: David Grider, Partner at FinalityCap
Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats

Editor's Note: This article discusses a proposal regarding the adjustment of Solana staking rewards. The proposal's arguments have encountered issues, particularly concerning the impact of high staking rewards on DeFi yields and the effect of inflation on selling pressure. David counters by suggesting that the relationship between staking rewards, network security, and market demand is closely intertwined, and that staking rewards should be determined by the market.

The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for readability):

I am very concerned about the inflation reduction proposal SIMD-0228 put forth for Solana, especially the current version proposed by TusharJain and kankanivishal from multicoincap, as well as MaxResnick1, particularly without addressing some critical risks and issues.

Solana Stake Reward Adjustment Proposal, What Impact on SOL Price?

After listening to the latest Solana Validator Community Call, I believe that the arguments made for implementing this change have significant flaws.

Here is a summary of the arguments presented, which I will refute in detail in upcoming tweets:

1: High staking rewards are detrimental to DeFi yields

2: Inflation increases selling pressure and should be compared to network fees

3: High staking rewards reduce ETF demand

4: Staking rewards do not offer U.S. tax optimization as capital gains do

5: Higher staking rewards do not lead to a higher price

6: The staking formula will optimize the staking ratio, thus addressing security concerns (in my view, this is a critical security risk and a flawed approach)

Argument 1: A high staking rate is detrimental to DeFi yields.

Refutation 1: SOL staking is Solana's risk-free rate. Just as a higher risk-free rate on government bonds leads to an increase in rates on the credit curve, higher staking rewards will drive up DeFi rates and profits.

Point 2: Inflation has increased selling pressure, which should be compared to fees.

Rebuttal 2: This is not valid, just like unlocking does not necessarily bring selling pressure, whether to sell depends on the holder's choice. Validators can choose to restake their staking rewards. The impact of inflation on liquidity is smaller compared to other supply factors. Instead of comparing selling pressure to fees, it is better to compare it to fund flows. One can look at the Solana ETP fund flows as a measurable metric, but demand from funds and individuals is larger and more significant.

Point 3: High staking rewards have reduced the demand for ETFs.

Rebuttal 3: Just because someone has used this point to explain the softness in ETH ETF demand does not mean it applies to Solana as well. Look at many of Europe's SOL ETPs; they take the entire staking yield and do not charge fees, attracting significant inflows of funds (as mentioned above). Moreover, US ETFs are also nearing approval for staking, so in the long run, this point does not hold.

Point 4: Staking rewards are not as tax-optimized as capital gains.

Rebuttal 4: Solana is a globally decentralized network; we should not optimize solely for US tax policies as tax policies can change at any time. This is similar to how equity investors would overlook the impact of tax changes on stock valuation.

Point 5: Higher staking rewards will not lead to a higher price.

Rebuttal 5: Real-world evidence proves this point invalid. Just look at how traditional currencies are priced. The valuation of one currency against another is usually based on the interest rate differential. Higher rates typically lead to a stronger currency. Here is a chart showing the USD/JPY against the US 10-year Treasury and Japanese 10-year Government Bond yield differentials as an example.

Point 6: The staking formula will optimize the staking ratio, thus addressing security concerns.

Rebuttal 6: It also needs to optimize the number of validators and staking distribution. Running Solana validators is costly, and the number of validators has been decreasing.

Rebuttal 6 (Continued): An analysis that must be conducted in order to move forward safely with this proposal, but what I have not seen yet is:

Simulating how many of the currently active small validators would become unprofitable and drop out under the new proposal. This needs to be analyzed under different network activity and SOL price assumptions, especially in a bear market scenario considering a 80% drop in both MEV and base fees, as well as prices. Then, looking at the current Solana validator list, see how many current validators would become unprofitable and drop out under these scenarios.

We can discuss how many validators Solana needs. It may not need to artificially inflate to 100,000 like ETH, but we also do not want Solana to become a Cosmos chain with only 100 validators.

Additionally, because proponents have brought up the argument of U.S. tax implications to drive this proposal, we are also not sure what the SEC's decentralization test standards are, so it might be desirable to keep the validator count above 1,000 to keep SOL as a commodity.

In conclusion, unless someone has at least done this analysis, this proposal should not go through.

The proposal indeed raises the right question: how much inflation is needed? But before making a change, there are other questions we need to answer. I do agree that this number could be lower and should be more dynamic. Just as a company does not need to pay a fixed amount to suppliers or provide a fixed return to financiers, the market should determine this number, so I support this direction. We just need to slow down, do more work to understand its impact.

This could actually be a high-level approach to addressing this risk.

My sincere suggestion is, we should not assume and generalize its impact. Data analysis should be done, displaying all assumptions and data.

Original Article Link

-- Price

--

You may also like

Why have foreign exchange stablecoins never taken off?

Rather than issuing a local currency stablecoin from scratch, it is better to build a layer of foreign currency pricing on top of a USD stablecoin, allowing users to enjoy the liquidity of the dollar while keeping accounts in local currency.

AIDC, computing power leasing, and cloud: The "three-part thesis" of AI transformation in cryptocurrency mining farms

The "AI transformation" of cryptocurrency mining farms is not just a slogan; it is unfolding in three recognizable stages.

Futu has had all its illegal gains confiscated, reminding cryptocurrency exchanges

Even if foreign financial institutions obtain licenses abroad, as long as you are effectively providing financial services to residents in mainland China, Chinese regulatory authorities may evaluate your actions according to Chinese law.

Football, Web3 & Champions' Energy: A Recap of WEEX's LALIGA VIP Meetup in Barcelona

Relive WEEX's exclusive LALIGA VIP Meetup in Barcelona with football legend Fernando Morientes. From a fireside chat and on-site WEEX x LALIGA signing to partner awards and a live LALIGA match broadcast, discover how WEEX connected football culture, Web3, and community.

Pizza, Poker & AI Trading: A Recap of WEEX Crypto Pizza Day in Dubai

Relive WEEX Crypto Pizza Day in Dubai, where the MENA crypto community gathered at WEEX Dubai Studio to celebrate Bitcoin Pizza Day with pizza, poker, networking, and a live AI trading competition. Discover how WEEX turned a historic crypto milestone into a hands-on AI trading experience.

IOSG Founder: Please tell Vitalik the truth, let the OGs who have enjoyed the industry's dividends enlighten the young people

The wage earners freeze to death on the road, the sellers of goods die of thirst on the way. The weavers of brocade wear coarse cloth, and the grain growers do not have enough to eat.

Contents

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com